Thursday, July 14, 2011

Like watching a soap opera

Following what's going on in Washington these days is like watching a soap opera.  It goes on and on, and it's annoying and frustrating.  But I'm hooked on the drama and can't stop watching.  If you, too, are hooked (despite yourself), you might want to subscribe to the "First Read" daily email from NBC News.

Here's an excerpt from today's titled "Always Darkest Before the Deal:"
With the clock ticking on debt ceiling, the news appears grim. Moody’s says it’s reviewing a possible downgrade of the government’s AAA bond rating. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke warned of financial calamity if the debt ceiling isn’t increased. And at yesterday’s White House meeting to find a resolution to the legislative impasse, President Obama clashed with House Minority Leader Eric Cantor. But as we said during the looming possibility of a government shutdown in the spring, it’s always darkest before the deal.

*** Obama vs. Cantor: As for yesterday’s Obama vs. Cantor clash, it ISN’T striking that it happened; after all, these players have to be plenty frustrated by now. But what IS striking is that Cantor went directly to the press to tell his version of the story. After yesterday's meeting, Cantor recounted telling the participants that there would have to be multiple debt-ceiling increases to get through Nov. 2012. “Well that's when [Obama] got very agitated seemingly and said that had sat there long enough and no other president, Ronald Reagan wouldn't sit here like this, and that he's reached the point that something's gotta give,” Cantor said, per NBC’s Frank Thorp. “And he said to me, ‘Eric, don't call my bluff.’ He said, ‘I'm going to the American people with this.’” After that, Cantor says Obama got up and said, “I’ll see you tomorrow.” (And they meet again today at 4:15 pm ET.) There are a LOT of folks on all sides of these talks who believe the group is too big and that too much leaks out or simply gets read out, which is why there is speculation the president asks them all to come to Camp David (keep them from cameras).

*** Dems push back: Democrats dispute Cantor’s version of events. One Democratic aide said Cantor’s story was overblown. “For someone who knows how to walk out of a meeting, you'd think he know it when he saw it. Cantor rudely interrupted the president three times to advocate for short-term debt ceiling increases while the president was wrapping the meeting.” 

*** Cantor’s isolation: What has become increasingly clear is that Cantor has become the person to watch in this entire debate. He’s either the Tea Party hero or scapegoat. Or both. He also has become isolated -- even within his party. There’s Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who told conservative talk-radio host Laura Ingraham yesterday that Republicans are at risk if there’s a default. "You know, it's an argument he has a good chance of winning, and all of a sudden we [Republicans] have co-ownership of a bad economy," McConnell said. "That is a very bad positioning going into an election." And GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham said that Republicans should be open to increasing revenues. As Politico writes, “Cantor has a lot riding on the outcome of the debt-limit negotiations. He’ll share in the public blame if they fall apart and the economy tanks, and he’ll face recriminations from his conservative base in the House if he cuts too soft a deal with the president.”

*** The three options to a resolution: Despite yesterday’s conflict, you can still see the making of a deal. And there are essentially three paths to a resolution. One is the somewhat maligned but viable McConnell “Hail Mary punt,” which would only deny the president’s request for a debt ceiling raise if veto-proof majorities in BOTH houses of Congress disapprove of the request. Two is the cuts the members of the so-called Biden group came up with (Cantor is among the advocates of this route). And three, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is pushing the idea of creating a binding congressional commission to handle either tax reform, Social Security reform, or both (modeled after the Social Security reform commission of the ‘80s and a little bit from the military base closing commission in the early ‘90s). The commission recommendations would NOT be subject to any alterations by Congress and instead would only be subject to an up-or-down vote.

*** How you still get to the grand bargain: Per one Democratic leadership insider, pieces of all three contingency plans could turn into the "grand bargain." For instance: You get a significant amount of cuts from the Biden group (think $700 to $800 billion) to get a six-month raise in the debt ceiling. Also included would be the binding Reid commissions to tackle tax reform and entitlement reform. They’d have, say, three months to get tax reform done and six months to get the entitlement reform done. Whatever they agreed to would be subject to the up-or-down vote, and if tax reform got enacted, then it would be linked to another large chunk of cuts (the rest of the Biden cuts, plus maybe more). And as a failsafe, the McConnell concept on the debt ceiling would also be part of the deal if both tax reform and entitlement reform failed. To be clear, the above plan is not being considered right now. It’s more of an example of how convoluted the eventual roadmap to a deal is going to be.
Looks like compromise may be coming.  Obama's getting mad.  (Yay.)  He's doing regional press interviews today at 2PM ET (hat-tip: Politico Playbook daily email), which give him the opportunity to "take it to the people."  Eric Cantor seems to have gone too far and is starting to alienate his own Party.  (It's about time.)  And time is running out. 

Stay tuned.

4 comments:

  1. That's about it, Sandy. We're all hooked, I guess. I read First Read a lot, and read this one today. We can only hope Cantor is alienating lots of independents and moderate Republicans out there. Don't know how he can't be.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I still have to wonder if the very people responsible for the situation we're in (out of control debt) should be given the responsibility of straightening it out. For certain, the multi thousand page tax code has to be completely re-written, and a long hard look at special interests (read both sides of the aisle) must be taken for anything to work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You're right-- but it's not as much fun.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wayne - if not Congress, who should have the responsibility??

    ReplyDelete