Wednesday, January 25, 2012

I’ve decided


Even though I’m a true Democrat, I changed my voter registration to Republican so I could vote in Florida’s closed Presidential Preference Primary this month and influence the 2012 election process.

I’ve watched the Republican primary slate expand and contract, and now there are four men vying to run against President Obama on November 6th.  After a blow-out in South Carolina, Newt Gingrich now seems to have a good chance to beat Mitt Romney in Florida, but Rick Santorum and Ron Paul are hanging in, and as of now both seem likely to continue on to the next primaries in Maine and Nevada on February 4.

Florida’s primary is winner-take-all, and I don’t doubt that the winner will either be Romney or Gingrich.  So who should I vote for when the thought of either of them in the White House is enough to literally send me packing?

Here’s where I have to remember my strategy. 

My goal is not to choose the lesser of evils and give that candidate my vote.

My goal is to extend the length of time before the Republican nomination is assured and the candidates and their PACs completely turn their attention and their money to President Obama.

I want to keep them attacking each other as long as possible.  I want them to keep their “circular firing squad” in business.  I want them to keep tearing each other apart and doing our work for us as long as possible.  I want them paying for the commercials and attack ads that we would otherwise have to do.

So I’ve decided that casting my Florida Republican ballot for anyone-but-Mitt-or-Newt is the answer.

And since I believe that a Ron Paul third-party candidacy (which he has refused to rule out) would help Obama, I want to do what I can to encourage that decision.

That’s how I decided.  I’m going to cast my ballot for Ron Paul in the Florida Primary.

So what do you think about that?

9 comments:

  1. A fine example: a solid explanation of political strategy. Succinct, clear, to the point and very instructive.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ron Paul has expressed and sanctioned racist and anti- semitic writings. Are you being to clever? Would you have voted for hitler to stall the reds?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for reading and responding. I sort of understand where you are coming from but I hardly think the two situations are comparable and, like the best politicians, I don't deal in hypotheticals. I do think that, given I have chosen to use my right to vote in Florida's PPP, this decision is a good one in terms of helping shape the ultimate outcome.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great strategy. I not only agree wholeheartedly with it, but you've again proven that what Obama's team is missing is a FEMALE STRATEGIST, WHO'S NOT FROM CHICAGO, and who sees the big picture!

    ReplyDelete
  5. interesting thinking. Are the chances good that the goal to extend the length of time before the Republican nomination is decided will be realized by voting for someone other than Romney or Gingrich?

    ReplyDelete
  6. JL: Don't know but figure it can't hurt. Do you see a downside I missed?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Only downside is what I mentioned b4. Gingrich slips in, and in a black swan event beats Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If the majority of the voters in this country would vote for Gingrich over Obama, then it really will be time to pack up and move

    ReplyDelete
  9. I didn't change parties but totally understand those who did. Thought Obama's speech was good last night and also that Mitch Daniels did a very good job.

    ReplyDelete