Sunday, October 9, 2016

Get ready to vote for the judges

Vote by mail ballots have arrived, and my inbox is full of emails asking what to do about the judges. (They’re asking about other ballot questions as well, and at the end of this post, I’ll tell you what I plan to write about, and when.)

Of the 29 items on my ballot, 13 are related to judges. But it’s not as bad as it seems: all are merit-retention votes. In this post, I’ll explain what this means, which votes are on our ballot, and how I plan to vote.

What is a merit-retention vote?

Florida Supreme Court justices and District Courts of Appeal judges are appointed by the governor. But as explained by the Florida Bar:

"Justices and appeals court judges face the voters in merit retention elections every six years – except after their first appointments. Newly appointed justices and appeals court judges serve an initial term of at least one year and are then subject to the first merit retention reviews of their performances in the next general election.

"Only those judges receiving approval from a majority of the voters in the general election may continue in office for another six-year term. If voters choose not to retain a judge, a vacancy would be created and would be filled through the merit selection process, in which the governor would appoint one from three to six nominees submitted by a judicial nominating commission. Terms are staggered so that not all of the appellate judges face the voters in the same election."

Which merit-retention votes are on our ballot?

All Florida voters have the opportunity to vote for or against the retention of three Supreme Court justices this year. In addition, Collier County voters will vote on the retention of ten judges of the 14-county Second District Court of Appeal.

The lawyers who present their clients’ cases to the justices and judges on a daily basis are probably in the best position to know if they should be retained. So Florida voters are fortunate that every two years, the Florida Bar Association asks its in-state members to rate those up for retention of whom they have direct knowledge.

The names of those on our ballot, the percent of Florida Bar poll votes in support of their retention, and the governor who appointed them to the current position are:

Supreme Court justices

  • Charles T. Canady (84 percent) - appointed by Gov. Charlie Crist in 2008
  • Jorge Labarga (91 percent) - appointed by Gov. Charlie Crist in 2008
  • Ricky L. Polston (84 percent) - appointed by Gov. Charlie Crist in 2008

Second District Appeal Court judges

  • John Badalamenti (87 percent) - appointed by Gov. Rick Scott in 2015
  • Marva L. Crenshaw (87 percent) - appointed by Gov. Charlie Crist in 2009
  • Patricia J. Kelly (86 percent) - appointed by Gov. Jeb Bush in 2001
  • Nelly N. Khouzam (91 percent) - appointed by Gov. Charlie Crist in 2008
  • Matt Lucas (89 percent) - appointed by Gov. Rick Scott in 2014
  • Robert Morris (91 percent) - appointed by Gov. Charlie Crist in 2009
  • Stevan Travis Northcutt (92 percent) - appointed by Gov. Lawton Chiles in 1997
  • Samuel Salario, Jr. (88 percent) -  appointed by Gov. Rick Scott in 2014
  • Craig C. Villanti (90 percent) - appointed by Gov. Jeb Bush in 2003
  • Douglas Alan Wallace (88 percent) - appointed by Gov. Jeb Bush in 2003

Bios of these judges and justices are on the Florida Bar website here.

In addition to reviewing the Bar poll results, I Googled "Florida Merit Retention" for recent news about our ballot choices.

From an article in the Palm Beach Post, I learned that “No judge has ever been denied another six-year term since the system was implemented in 1976 after three elected justices were investigated, and two resigned, when an investigation found they allowed political cronies to influence their decision. Occasionally - most recently in 2012 when tea party activists targeted three high court justices - opposition has surfaced. None has emerged this year.”

From an Orlando Sentinel editorial, I learned that “All three [of the Supreme Court justices on the ballot] were appointed by former Gov. Charlie Crist, but Labarga normally votes with the court’s liberal majority, while Canady and Polston make up its conservative minority.”

I also learned, from a blog post in the Orlando Weekly, that Governor Scott has been “quietly at work shifting Florida’s courts rightward, leaving a judicial legacy that will far outlast his tenure.” In that regard, I noted that three of the judges on the ballot are Scott appointees: Badalamenti, Lucas and Salario. After reviewing their bios and Florida Bar ratings, I see no reason not to support their retention.

Referring to the Florida Bar poll, The Orlando Sentinel Editorial Board wrote:

"Such high ratings from lawyers who best know the work of the justices and judges, and the absence of controversy surrounding any of them, should be more than enough to persuade voters to retain them.

Critics of the retention process often point out that no justice or appellate judge has ever been rejected by voters. But that says more about the high caliber of justices and appellate judges in Florida, and the process for nominating them, than any defects in the system for evaluating them."

For more information about Florida’s judicial merit retention process, including a Guide for Florida Voters: Q and A about Judges, Judicial Elections and Merit Retention, related YouTube videos, and more, I recommend The Vote’s In Your Court.

How I will vote

In view of the strong support shown in the Bar’s merit retention poll, I will VOTE YES for the retention of the three Supreme Court justices and the ten Second District Appeals Court judges.

Upcoming election-related posts

There is just a month between now and Election Day (November 8), but vote-by-mail ballots are already out, and early voting begins October 24. My next priorities are to research and write about the Mosquito Control, Soil & Water Conservation District, and Fire District races, because while decisions made by those bodies are important to our quality of life in Collier County, they are receiving little press coverage.

If there’s still time, I’ll write about the two County Commission races, which have been and will continue to be covered. I won’t make my final decisions about them until I’ve watched the Naples Daily News candidate forum (postponed from last week due to Hurricane Matthew) and the Collier League of Women Voters’ forum to be held on October 17.

I sense a lot of election fatigue, and I understand that some want to fill out their ballots and be done with it. But there is much at stake, these are important decisions, and I don’t want to make mine in haste. Stay tuned.



Help me reach more Collier County voters by sharing this post with your friends. You and they can subscribe to Sparker’s Soapbox by email at www.sparkers-soapbox.blogspot.com, “like” me on Facebook at www.facebook.com/sparkers.soapbox or follow me on Twitter @SparkersSoapbox.

3 comments:

  1. Thank you for this! Not very many resources available about the other issues on the ballot. Regards!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. So glad you found it helpful! Please be sure to read thr post that follows, in which I changed my decision about Justices Canady and Polston!

      Delete
  2. thanks for your feedback. I found it helpful. I wish I knew where to go to see how judges voted on issues.

    ReplyDelete